|
|
|
North Coast TAFE > About us > Our vital statistics > VQF audit information
|
|
|
Summary of VQF audit information
As a Pre-qualified Supplier under the User Choice 2010–2015 program, TAFE NSW - North Coast Institute is required to publish audit information in relation to it’s compliance with the VET Quality Framework (VQF).
The User Choice program provides public funding paid directly to Pre-qualified Suppliers for the delivery of accredited entry-level training to eligible Apprentices and Trainees. The VQF is the national set of requirements which assures nationally consistent, high-quality training and assessment services for the clients of Australia’s vocational education and training system.
A VQF audit reviews evidence of an organisations’ compliance with the requirements of the VET Quality Framework and confirm that it is achieving quality training and assessment outcomes. The process also identifies opportunities for improvement on these outcomes.
This information is published to assist apprentices, trainees and their employers to make informed decisions regarding their selection of a Pre-qualified Supplier for the delivery of training and assessment services.
|
Audit Date:
|
15-18 May 2006
|
|
Qualifications Audited:
|
TDM20101 Certificate II in Maritime Operations
CUS40101 Certificate IV in Music
THT50202 Diploma of Event Management
BCP30103 Certificate III in Plumbing
SFI20104 Certificate II in Seafood Industry Aquaculture
RTF30103 Certificate III in Horticulture
|
|
Audit Outcomes:
|
No significant or critical non-compliances identified.
|
|
Summary of significant or critical non-compliances and action to rectify
|
Nil
|
Explanatory notes:
Non-compliance with the VQF means that requirements of the have not been met based on the evidence reviewed. Non-compliances are categorised as minor, significant or critical. For the purposes of the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, only significant and Critical non-compliances need to be published Minor: No, or minor, adverse impact on learners with no serious breakdown of provision of quality training and assessment.
Significant: Significant adverse impact on learners with insufficient focus on quality training and assessment outcomes.
Critical: Critical adverse impact on learners with widespread or persistent dissatisfaction with services and outcomes.
|
|
|
|